Bill Text - SB320 (2012)

Establishing penalties for receiving stolen scrap metal and a database for reports of stolen scrap metal..


Revision: Jan. 4, 2012, midnight

SB 320-FN – AS INTRODUCED

2012 SESSION

12-2986

08/09

SENATE BILL 320-FN

AN ACT establishing penalties for receiving stolen scrap metal and a database for reports of stolen scrap metal.

SPONSORS: Sen. Carson, Dist 14; Sen. Gallus, Dist 1; Sen. Luther, Dist 12; Sen. Merrill, Dist 21; Rep. Swinford, Belk 5; Rep. Welch, Rock 8; Rep. Shurtleff, Merr 10

COMMITTEE: Judiciary

ANALYSIS

This bill establishes penalties for knowingly receiving stolen scrap metal.

This bill also establishes a database for reports of stolen scrap metal.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

12-2986

08/09

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twelve

AN ACT establishing penalties for receiving stolen scrap metal and a database for reports of stolen scrap metal.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 Scrap Metal Theft; Penalties. RSA 322:13 is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

322:13 Penalty.

I. Any person who knowingly receives, retains, or disposes of the stolen scrap metal of another person shall be guilty of:

(a) A class B felony if the value of the scrap metal is more than $1,000; or

(b) A class A misdemeanor if the value of the scrap metal is $1,000 or less.

II. Any person who shall violate any other provision of RSA 322 or of his or her license, for which offense no other punishment is provided, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

2 New Section; Scrap Metal Theft; Database. Amend RSA 322 by inserting after section 13 the following new section:

322:14 Stolen Scrap Metal Database.

I. The department of safety shall establish a statewide database of all reported stolen scrap metal. Such database shall be available to the public on the department of safety’s website and shall contain the date of the reported theft, the location of the reported theft, a description of the materials stolen, and, if available, the final disposition of the case. The database shall not include the personal information of the victim of the crime or of any suspects. The database shall be updated within 24 hours of receiving a report of stolen scrap metal.

II. Upon receiving a report of stolen scrap metal, local law enforcement agencies shall report such stolen scrap metal to the department of safety for inclusion in the database established in paragraph I. Such report shall be made within 24 hours of the initial report of the crime to a local law enforcement agency.

3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2013.

LBAO

12-2986

Revised 01/04/12

SB 320 FISCAL NOTE

AN ACT establishing penalties for receiving stolen scrap metal and a database for reports of stolen scrap metal.

FISCAL IMPACT:

      The Judicial Branch, Judicial Council, Department of Corrections, and New Hampshire Association of Counties state this bill may increase state and county expenditures by an indeterminable amount in FY 2013 each year thereafter. The Department of Safety states this bill will increase highway fund expenditures by $92,613 in FY 2013, $54,463 in FY 2014, $57,453 in FY 2015, and $60,653 in FY 2016. There will be no fiscal impact on local expenditures or state, county, and local revenue.

METHODOLOGY:

    The Judicial Branch states this bill repeals and reenacts RSA 322:13 to deal with receiving, retaining or disposing of stolen scrap metal. The Branch states the potential for fiscal impact is in the prospect of new class B felonies and/ or new class A misdemeanors. The Branch has no information to estimate how many charges would be brought as a result of the changes contained in the bill to determine the fiscal impact on expenditures but does have information on the cost for processing a class B felony and a class A misdemeanor. All costs are estimated based on case weight information from the last needs assessment completed in 2005. The Branch states any felony resulting from RSA 322:13, I would be classified as an average routine criminal case. The Branch states an average routine criminal case will cost $389.84 per case in FY 2013 and $401.48 per case in FY 2014 and each year thereafter. The Branch states a class A misdemeanor will cost $59.11 per case in FY 2013 and $61.31 per case in FY 2014 and each year thereafter. The possibility of appeals increases the likelihood the fiscal impact on the Branch will exceed $10,000.

    The Judicial Council states this bill may result in an indeterminable increase in general fund expenditures. The Council states if an individual is found to be indigent, the flat fee of $275 per misdemeanor and $756.24 per felony is charged by a public defender or contract attorney. If an assigned counsel attorney is used the fee is $60 per hour with a cap of $1,400 for a misdemeanor charge and $4,100 for a felony charge. The Council also states additional costs could be incurred if an appeal is filed. The public defender, contract attorney and assigned counsel rates for Supreme Court appeals is $2,000 per case, with many assigned counsel attorneys seeking permission to exceed the fee cap. Requests to exceed the fee cap are seldom granted. Finally, expenditures would increase if services other than counsel are requested and approved by the court during the defense of a case or during an appeal.

    The Department of Safety states this bill also establishes a database for reports of stolen scrap metal. The Department will need to purchase or create a database to report on stolen scrap metal, maintain a public website, and purchase additional computer equipment or servers to store information. The Department estimates the design and implementation of a website will cost $60,000 of highway funds in FY 2013 and then $7,000 to maintain and support the website beginning in FY 2013 and each year thereafter. The Department assumes it will need one additional data entry position to handle the increased workload if there is a high volume of reports and data entry otherwise the Department may be able to absorb the workload with existing resources. The Department estimates the following highway fund expenses, based on effective date of bill:

     

    FY 2013

    FY 2014

    FY 2015

    FY 2016

    Data entry position (LG 9) salary

    $11,856

    $24,171

    $25,107

    $26,062

    Benefits

    10,757

    23,292

    25,346

    27,591

    Website design and support

    67,000

    7,000

    7,000

    7,000

    Office furniture and supplies

    1,500

    0

    0

    0

    Computer

    1,500

    0

    0

    0

    Total

    $92,613

    $54,463

    $57,453

    $60,653

    The Department of Corrections states it is not able to determine the fiscal impact of this bill because it does not have sufficient detail to predict the number of individuals who would be subject to this legislation. The Department of Corrections states the average annual cost of incarcerating an individual in the general prison population for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011 was $33,698. The cost to supervise an individual by the Department’s division of field services for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011 was $672.

    The New Hampshire Association of Counties states to the extent more individuals are charged, convicted, and sentenced to incarceration in a county correctional facility, the counties may have increased expenditures. The Association is unable to determine the number of individuals who might be charged, convicted or incarcerated as a result of this bill to determine an exact fiscal impact. The average annual cost to incarcerate an individual in a county correctional facility is approximately $35,000. There is no impact on county revenue.

    The Department of Justice states this bill will have no fiscal impact on the Department. The Department states county attorneys, not the Department, typically prosecute these types of cases and if this bill results in a minimal increase in criminal appellate work, this cost could be absorbed by the Department.