HB656 (2013) Detail

Requiring state agencies to develop performance measures and to develop budgets for each biennium.


HB 656-FN – AS INTRODUCED

2013 SESSION

13-0169

05/09

HOUSE BILL 656-FN

AN ACT requiring state agencies to develop performance measures and to develop budgets for each biennium.

SPONSORS: Rep. Umberger, Carr 2; Rep. L. Ober, Hills 37; Rep. Leishman, Hills 24; Sen.?Bradley, Dist 3

COMMITTEE: Executive Departments and Administration

ANALYSIS

This bill:

I. Removes the requirement in current law that agencies submit a maintenance budget as part of the biennial budget process.

II. Requires agencies to submit an organization chart with the agency’s request for expenditures.

III. Requires agencies to develop program performance measures and establishes a commission to oversee the development of performance measurement systems by state agencies.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

13-0169 05/09

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Thirteen

AN ACT requiring state agencies to develop performance measures and to develop budgets for each biennium.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 Requests for Appropriations; Estimates of Expenditure Requirements. RSA 9:4, I and II are repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

I. On or before October 1 prior to each biennial legislative session, all departments of the state shall transmit to the commissioner of administrative services, on blanks to be furnished by the commissioner, estimates of their expenditure requirements for each fiscal year of the ensuing biennium for administration, operation, and program services, including costs for workers’ compensation and unemployment compensation. In case of the failure of any department to submit such estimates within the time above specified, the commissioner of administrative services shall cause to be prepared such estimates for such department as in the commissioner’s opinion are reasonable and proper.

II. Each department shall include with the expenditure estimates submitted under paragraph I an organization chart that identifies each employee position by position number, indicates whether the position is funded in the budget submission, and indicates whether the position is vacant or filled.

2 New Chapter; Performance Measurement System. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 21-U the following new chapter:

CHAPTER 21-V

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

21-V:1 Definitions. In this chapter:

I. “End outcome measures” shall be designed to evaluate an agency’s progress toward the achievement of the agency’s objectives and the fulfillment of its mission statement. End outcome measures normally focus on the consequences of program implementation and the effect of the program on those served. Because one program may have several different objectives, several different end outcome measures may be necessary so that each objective is measured.

II. “Input measures” measure the amount of resources applied, and, when related to output or outcome information, provide indicators of efficiency and productivity.

III. “Mission statement” means a succinct definition of purpose to clarify the intended results.

IV. “Goals” define what the agency hopes to accomplish within a specific time period.

21-V:2 Performance Measurement System. Beginning January 1, 2014, each agency, as defined in RSA 21-G:5, III, shall adopt a performance measurement system for each of its programs that includes: a mission statement, the outcomes the program seeks to achieve, and the specific outcome measures that the program intends to use to track performance. The performance measures to be developed shall incorporate both input and end outcome measures. The performance measurement system shall be developed at the departmental level and shall serve as a model for program level performance measurement.

21-V:3 Development of Performance Measurement System by Agencies. On or before July 1, 2014, each agency, as defined in RSA 21-G:5, III, shall provide to the oversight commission established in RSA 21-V:5 a contact person within the agency who shall be responsible for providing the commission with information as to that agency’s development and implementation of the performance measurement system required under RSA 21-V:2. Each agency shall cooperate with the commission and shall provide the requested information in a timely manner.

21-V:4 Reporting Requirement.

I. On or before January 15, 2014, each agency shall submit an initial report on the development and adoption of a performance measurement system. The report shall identify the performance measures developed pursuant to RSA 21-V:2 and shall report on those measures to the extent of the available data. Copies of the report shall be forwarded to the oversight commission established in RSA 21-V:5, the house and senate finance committees, the speaker of the house of representatives, the president of the senate, the governor, the house clerk, the senate clerk, and the state library.

II. Beginning July 1, 2014, each agency shall submit an annual report of its performance based on the performance measurement systems developed under this chapter. The report shall be submitted to the oversight commission established in RSA 21-V:5, the house and senate finance committees, the speaker of the house of representatives, the president of the senate, the governor, the house clerk, the senate clerk, and the state library. The reports also shall be available to the public on the state transparency website in a format that permits data comparisons by performance measure, geographic location, and demographic group. The website shall provide data for at least 2 prior years for each performance indicator so that comparisons may be made and trends identified.

21-V:5 Performance Measurement System; Oversight Commission Established.

I. There is established a performance measurement system oversight commission.

II.(a) The members of the commission shall be as follows:

(1) One member of the executive branch, appointed by the governor.

(2) Five agency commissioners, one of whom shall serve as an alternate, appointed by the commissioners.

(3) The chairperson of the senate finance committee.

(4) The chairperson of the house finance committee.

(5) The vice-chairperson of the house finance committee.

(6) One minority member of the house finance committee, appointed by the chairperson of the finance committee.

(7) Two legislative members, appointed by the chairperson of the house finance committee.

(8) Two members of legislative policy committees, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives.

(b) Legislative members of the commission shall serve a term co-terminous with their term in office. Members appointed under subparagraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) shall serve 2-year terms, except that the initial appointment of 2 of the commissioners appointed under subparagraph (a)(2) shall be for one-year terms. Members of the commission shall serve without compensation, provided that legislative members of the commission shall receive mileage at the legislative rate when attending to the duties of the commission.

III. The commission shall:

(a) Oversee the development of performance based measurement systems by state agencies.

(b) Study performance based measurement systems used by other states.

(c) Provide information and technical assistance to agencies in developing program-specific measurement tools.

(d) Make recommendations relative to the integration of the performance based measurement system with the state budget process.

IV. The members of the commission shall elect a chairperson from among the members. The first meeting of the commission shall be called by the first-named house member. The first meeting of the commission shall be held within 45 days of the effective date of this section. Seven members of the commission shall constitute a quorum.

V. Beginning November 1, 2014 and annually thereafter, the commission shall report its findings and any recommendations for proposed legislation to the speaker of the house of representatives, the president of the senate, the house and senate finance committees, the house clerk, the senate clerk, the governor, and the state library.

3 Repeal. RSA 21-V:5, relative to the performance measurement system oversight commission, is repealed.

4 Effective Date.

I. Section 3 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2019.

II. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.

LBAO

13-0169

Revised 02/06/13

HB 656 FISCAL NOTE

AN ACT requiring state agencies to develop performance measures and to develop budgets for each biennium.

FISCAL IMPACT:

      The Department of Administrative Services states this bill, as introduced, may increase state expenditures by an indeterminable amount in FY 2014 and each year thereafter. There will be no impact on state, county, and local revenue, or county and local expenditures.

METHODOLOGY:

    The Department of Administrative Services states this bill modifies the agency phase of the biennial budget process and requires agencies develop performance measures for state programs. The bill: removes the requirement in RSA 9:4, II that agencies submit a maintenance budget as part of the budget process; requires agency budget submissions include an organizational chart identifying employees by position number, whether the position is funded or not funded, and whether the position is vacant or filled; requires each agency create a performance measurement system for each state program, report on those measures in an annual report, and publish results on the Transparent NH website in a format that allows data comparisons by performance measure, geographic location, and demographic group; and creates a performance measurement system oversight commission to provide recommendations to state agencies and study performance-based measures in other states.

    The Department states it is unable to determine how much time will be required to complete the budget process as outlined in the bill, and whether the process will require additional resources for each agency. Additionally, the Department states it is unable to determine the cost and development time for the Department of Information Technology to modify the Transparent NH website to meet the functionality requirements detailed in the bill, and whether these costs can be absorbed within the Department of Administrative Service’s budget for web support and development.