HB1576 (2016) Detail

Repealing the licensure of dogs.


\t \t\t \t\t \t\t \t \t \t\t

HB 1576-FN-LOCAL - AS INTRODUCED

 

2016 SESSION

\t16-2503

\t08/10

 

HOUSE BILL\t1576-FN-LOCAL

 

AN ACT\trepealing the licensure of dogs.

 

SPONSORS:\tRep. Hull, Graf. 9; Rep. Sylvia, Belk. 6; Rep. Aldrich, Belk. 2; Rep. Ammon, Hills. 40

 

COMMITTEE:\tMunicipal and County Government

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

ANALYSIS

 

\tThis bill repeals the requirement that dogs be licensed by the municipality in which their owners reside, and the authority to license cats.  

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Explanation:\tMatter added to current law appears in bold italics.

\t\tMatter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

\t\tMatter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

\t16-2503

\t08/10

 

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

 

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Sixteen

 

AN ACT\trepealing the licensure of dogs.

 

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

 

\t1  Licensure Requirement Removed.  Amend RSA 466:42-b to read as follows:

\t466:42-b  Civil Recovery.  Whoever wrongfully kills or maims, entices or carries away a [licensed] dog shall be liable to its owner for its value in a civil proceeding.

\t2  Licensure Requirement Removed.  Amend RSA 466:48 to read as follows:

\t466:48 Registration.  [In addition to the dog license required by RSA 466:4,] No guard dog shall be used in any city or town without prior approval of the local law enforcement authority and appropriate registration with that authority.

\t3  Repeal.  The following are repealed:

\t\tI.  RSA 466:1 through RSA 466:18-a, relative to the licensure of dogs and authority to license cats.

\t\tII.  RSA 466:32, relative to the compensation of certain officers from the licensure of dogs.

\t\tIII.  RSA 466:39, relative to bylaws on licensure of dogs.

\t\tIV.  RSA 466:47, relative to the licensure of guard dogs.

\t\tV.  RSA 466:50, IV, relative to guard dogs.

\t4  Effective Date.  This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.

 

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tLBAO

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t16-2503

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t11/30/15

 

HB 1576-FN-LOCAL- FISCAL NOTE

 

AN ACT\trepealing the licensure of dogs.

 

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Department of Agriculture, Markets and Food and New Hampshire Municipal Association state this bill, as introduced, will have an indeterminable fiscal impact on state and local revenue and expenditures in FY 2017 and in each year thereafter.  There will be no fiscal impact on county revenue or expenditures.

 

METHODOLOGY:

The Department of Agriculture, Markets and Food states this bill repeals various statutes relative to the licensing of dogs and cats.  The Department assumes, due to lack of funding, the state Animal Population Control Program (APCP) established in RSA 437-A would be discontinued along with one program assistant position.  The program has an annual budget of approximately $335,000 which is funded in excess of 99% by annual license fees.  The Department makes the following assumptions concerning the fiscal impact if this bill:

 

    \t\t\t
  • Based on information from the International City/County Management Association, each dollar spent by the APCP reduces local expenditures by $3.23.
  • Each year the APCP receives over 5,000 requests for applications from pet owners and approximately 3,000 surgeries are supported by the program.  Some low income pet owners would not spay or neuter their pets without assistance from the program.  
  • Towns would save on the cost of animal tags which range in price from $0.10 to $0.15 per piece depending on the quantity purchased.
  • There would be no list maintained of dog owners to be share with emergency responders, public health officials, or animal cruelty investigators. Any associated cost cannot be determined.
  • Towns would lose $4.50 to $7.00 of revenue per license, additional revenue from late licensing and forfeitures, and revenue from transferred licenses which is used to fund animal control, police or general government.
  • Towns would continue to be legally obligated to capture and hold strays while attempting to identify the owner, and maintain the expertise and ability to carry out the provisions of rabies quarantine enforcement.  
  • Funding of the New Hampshire Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory under RSA 466:9, II, would end and most likely result in closure of the lab which would and impact public and animal health, food safety, and the agriculture industry.  The potential impact cannot be determined.
  • Without licensure, it would not be possible to trace dogs back to their owners for confirmation of rabies vaccination.  A bite or scratch from an unidentifiable dog would necessitate post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for the humans involved.  The Department states the average cost for PEP are approximately $4,000 per person.
\t\t

 

The New Hampshire Municipal Association states this bill repeals the requirement that all dogs be licensed and repeals the authority of municipalities to require the licensing of cats.  The Association states dog and cat licenses are subject to a fee of $4.50 or $7 depending on the age of the animal and whether it has been spayed or neutered.  The fee is $2 if the owner is 65 years of age or older.  The Association states a portion of the fee is retained by the municipality thus this bill would result in a significant loss of municipal revenue.  The Association indicates it does not have information on the amount of revenue collected by the municipalities and cannot estimate the effect on municipal revenue.