HB389 (2011) Detail

Relative to broadband infrastructure.






AN ACT relative to broadband infrastructure.

SPONSORS: Rep. Pastor, Graf 9; Rep. Remick, Coos 2; Rep. Rappaport, Coos 1; Rep. Pierce, Graf 9; Sen. Houde, Dist 5

COMMITTEE: Science, Technology and Energy


This bill changes requirements for the issuance of broadband infrastructure bonds by municipalities.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.




In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Eleven

AN ACT relative to broadband infrastructure.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 Findings and Purpose. The general court finds that:

I. Universal, easy, and affordable access to high speed Internet service in New Hampshire is essential for economic development, job creation, small business growth, state, federal, and local service delivery, and educational opportunities.

II. Current New Hampshire law makes universal access to broadband Internet services effectively impossible by discouraging competition. Such lack of universal access is a significant missed opportunity for building the state’s economy and putting people back to work.

III. The state of New Hampshire must act decisively to facilitate the infrastructure investments that are needed to make broadband/high speed Internet available to its citizens, just as it does with electricity, telephone service, highways, and roads.

IV. Open access technology platforms and universal access are the keys to establishing a thriving, competitive market offering low cost, high-speed Internet services to the public.

V. The state should allow our counties and municipalities to provide access to service by building broadband infrastructure, provided they do not provide broadband services themselves.

VI. The state should facilitate rigorous competition in the broadband market and remove barriers that protect vested interests and discourage competition.

VII. Public-private partnerships are critical to achieving success in effectively building out infrastructure to the premises (i.e. “Last Mile” buildout to residential and businesses in communities) because more stakeholders, rather than fewer, get engaged in and take ownership of any build-out initiative.

VIII. The state should stimulate high speed Internet expansion by providing targeted tax credits and eliminating barriers that limit our counties’ and municipalities’ ability to use revenue bonds and other financial instruments to access the capital needed for infrastructure development.

IX. The purpose of this section is to give municipalities local control over whether to utilize these tools to build-out high speed Internet infrastructure, provided that their citizens request and approve such action through the local legislative process.

2 Municipal Finance; Purpose of Issue of Bonds or Notes. Amend RSA 33:3 to read as follows:

33:3 Purpose of Issue of Bonds or Notes. A municipality or county may issue its bonds or notes for the acquisition of land, for planning relative to public facilities, for the construction, reconstruction, alteration, and enlargement or purchase of public buildings, for other public works or improvements of a permanent nature including broadband infrastructure as defined in RSA 38:38, I(e), [to be purchased or constructed in areas not served by an existing broadband carrier or provider], for the purchase of departmental equipment of a lasting character, for the payment of judgments, and for purposes of economic development which shall include public-private partnerships involving capital improvements, loans, and guarantees. The public benefit in any public-private partnership must outweigh any benefit accruing to a private party. Bonds or notes for the purposes of economic development may be issued only after the governing body of the municipality or county has held hearings and presented the public benefit findings to the public and after such issuance has been approved by the legislative body. A municipality or county shall not issue bonds or notes to provide for the payment of expenses for current maintenance and operation except as otherwise specifically provided by law.

3 Definitions; Revenue-Producing Facilities. Amend RSA 33-B:1, VI to read as follows:

VI. “Revenue-producing facilities” means water works, broadband infrastructure as defined in RSA 38:38, I(e), [purchased or constructed in areas not served by an existing broadband carrier or provider,] sewerage systems, sewage treatment or disposal facilities, solid waste disposal or resource recovery facilities, parking facilities, facilities for the production, generation, transmission, or distribution of electricity or gas and any other real or personal property or interests in a municipality or regional water district owned or controlled by the municipality or regional water district, from the operation of which revenues are or are expected to be derived by the municipality, or regional water district.

4 New Sections; Issuance of Revenue Bonds. Amend RSA 38 by inserting after section 41 the following new sections:

38:42 Issuance of Revenue Bonds. A municipality shall not issue revenue bonds under RSA 33-B for the purpose of financing the development, construction, reconstruction, renovation, improvement, and acquisition of broadband infrastructure unless:

I. A request for proposals for private broadband investment in the municipality has been issued and responses considered;

II. The local legislative body determines that the benefit to the public accruing from any planned public-private partnership relating to the issuance of revenue bonds outweighs the benefit accruing to the private member of the partnership. Such public benefit requirement is satisfied without limitation if the governing body of the municipality has held hearings and presented the public benefit findings to its citizens, and, as a consequence of weighing the testimony elicited in such hearings, the legislative body approves the issuance of such bonds as required under RSA 33-B.

38:43 Broadband Infrastructure; Exclusion from Debt Limit. Any debt incurred for broadband infrastructure by the issuance of bonds consistent with RSA 38:42 shall be outside the debt limit prescribed in RSA 33. Such debt shall at no time be included in the net indebtedness of any municipality for the purpose of determining its borrowing capacity.

38:44 Expenditure of Funds. Funds from the issuance of a revenue bond for broadband infrastructure shall only be expended to deploy broadband infrastructure in a universal and non discriminatory manner and, at a minimum, in those areas of the municipality having the least adequate access to broadband service.

38:45 License and Permit Neutrality. In determining whether the public good requires a municipality to grant, change, or revoke any permit or license to any entity under RSA 231:161 or RSA 231:163, the effect that such action may have upon the viability or success of the municipality’s broadband infrastructure, whether existing, planned, or contemplated, shall not be a factor in such determination or in determining the terms and conditions of any license or permit that results.

5 Broadband Access; Definitions; Broadband. RSA 38:38, I(c) is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

(c) “Broadband” means advanced communications systems capable of providing high-speed transmission of services such as data, voice, and video over the Internet and other networks with transmission provided by a range of technologies including digital subscriber line and fiber optic cable, coaxial cable, wireless technology, and satellite. Broadband enables the convergence of voice, video, and data services onto a single network.

6 Broadband Access. Amend RSA 38:38, II to read as follows:

II. A municipality [may] shall use its broadband infrastructure for the purpose of providing an open network [and assuring that third party access is available in accordance with current state and federal regulations] and shall make use of open network interfaces. No municipality shall be a retail provider of broadband service.

7 Broadband Access Tariffs. Amend RSA 38:39 to read as follows:

38:39 Broadband Access Tariffs. For defraying the cost of acquisition, construction, payment of the interest on any debt incurred, management, maintenance, operation, and repair of broadband infrastructure, or the construction, enlargement, or improvement of such systems, the governing body [may] shall establish a scale of rates called access tariffs, [may] shall prescribe the manner and the time for the payment of such tariffs, and may change such tariffs when it deems advisable.

8 New Paragraph; Pole Attachments. Amend RSA 374:34-a by inserting after paragraph VII the following new paragraph:

VIII. Pole attachments sought by a municipality for the provision of broadband access pursuant to RSA 38:38-45 shall be subject to this section.

9 Repeal. The following are repealed:

I. RSA 33:3-c, I(e), relative to the issuance of bonds for preliminary expenses.

II. RSA 33:3-g, relative to broadband infrastructure bonds.

III. RSA 33:6-f, relative to exclusion from debt limit; broadband infrastructure.

IV. RSA 38:38, I(b), relative to the definition of “areas not served.”

10 Effective Date. This act shall take effect July 1, 2011.





AN ACT relative to broadband infrastructure.


      The New Hampshire Municipal Association and the Department of Revenue Administration state this bill may increase local expenditures by an indeterminable amount in FY 2012 and in each fiscal year thereafter. There will be no fiscal impact on state and county revenues or expenditures or local revenues.


    The New Hampshire Municipal Association states this bill changes the requirements for issuance of broadband infrastructure revenue bonds by municipalities. The Association states this bill may increase local expenditures in FY 2012 and in each fiscal year thereafter, as municipalities may incur costs associated with the bill’s requirement related to deploying such infrastructure in a “universal and non-discriminatory” basis. The Association further states these costs are indeterminable and would likely preclude broadband infrastructure revenue bonds from being economically viable.

    The Department of Revenue Administration states this bill may increase local expenditures by an indeterminable amount in FY 2012 and in each fiscal year thereafter. The Department is unable to estimate this bill’s fiscal impact as it is unable to predict how many municipalities would attempt to pass bonds locally or what project costs may be.