Bill Text - HB648 (2013)

Permitting current marital masters to remain in office until retirement, resignation, disability, or nonrenewal of appointment.


Revision: Feb. 12, 2013, midnight

HB 648-FN – AS INTRODUCED

2013 SESSION

13-0734

09/10

HOUSE BILL 648-FN

AN ACT permitting current marital masters to remain in office until retirement, resignation, disability, or nonrenewal of appointment.

SPONSORS: Rep. G. Richardson, Merr 10; Rep. Wallner, Merr 10; Rep. Walz, Merr 23

COMMITTEE: Judiciary

ANALYSIS

This bill permits current marital masters to remain in office until retirement, resignation, disability, or nonrenewal of appointment.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

13-0734

09/10

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Thirteen

AN ACT permitting current marital masters to remain in office until retirement, resignation, disability, or nonrenewal of appointment.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 Circuit Court Judges; Marital Masters. RSA 490-F:7, III is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

III. Upon the retirement, resignation, disability, or nonrenewal of appointment of a marital master, the position shall be converted to a full-time judicial position, provided that the fiscal committee of the general court approves and further provided that sufficient funds have been appropriated for the salary and benefits of the full-time judicial position. Once converted to a full-time judicial vacancy, the governor may nominate and the council may confirm any qualified person pursuant to part 2, article 46 of the New Hampshire constitution. If the fiscal committee of the general court does not approve, or if there are not sufficient funds available to fund the salary and benefits of the full-time judicial position, the master position shall not be eliminated, and a new master may be appointed pursuant to RSA 490-D:7.

2 Repeal. The following are repealed:

I. 2011, 272:3, relative to marital master contracts.

II. 2012, 66:1-7, relative to the prospective repeal of provisions relative to marital masters.

III. 2012, 66:8, relative to marital master contracts.

3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage.

LBAO

13-0734

Revised 02/11/13

HB 648 FISCAL NOTE

AN ACT permitting current marital masters to remain in office until retirement, resignation, disability, or nonrenewal of appointment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

      The Judicial Branch states this bill, as introduced, may decrease state general fund expenditures by $217,987 in FY 2014, $298,212 in FY 2015, $537,616 in FY 2016, and $596,424 in FY 2017. There is no fiscal impact on county and local expenditures, or state, county and local revenue.

METHODOLOGY:

    The Judicial Branch states this bill would repeal and reenact RSA 490-F:7, III and would repeal Chapter 272:3, Laws of 2011 and Chapter 66:8, Laws of 2012 to allow currently serving marital masters to remain in office. Under current statute and Chapter 272:3, Laws of 2011 and Chapter 66:8, Laws of 2012 the currently serving marital masters’ positions end on the expiration of their current terms. There are six marital masters whose terms expire on the following dates: May 3, 2014; May 21, 2014 (two marital masters); October 15, 2015; and April 5, 2016 (two marital masters). The Branch will no longer assume marital master positions will be converted into full-time judge positions as the marital master terms end. As a result, payouts of $217,987 in FY 2014 and $189,702 in FY 2016 will no longer be made. The difference between a marital master salary and benefits to a judge is $101,674. The Branch assumes the following savings by not converting marital master positions to judges: $305,022 in FY 2015 (three times the $101,674 difference), $355,859 in FY 2016 (three and half times the $101,674 difference) and $610,044 in FY 2017 (six times the $101,674 difference). For each marital master position, the Branch receives approximately 2.03% of the marital master salary or $2,270 ($111,826 * 2.03%) in federal reimbursement for time marital masters spend on child support cases (Title IV-D cases). The Branch states any potential savings will need to be offset by the federal reimbursement, which would have been lost if the marital master position had been converted. The Branch states the following federal reimbursements are $6,810 in FY 2015, $7,945 in FY 2016 and $13,620 in FY 2017. RSA 490-D:9 requires all marital master orders need to be signed by a judge. The Branch has no calculation of judge time involved with reviewing and certifying marital master recommendations to determine the cost of this activity to determine the impact on the potential savings. The Branch estimates the savings, less any judge time to review and certify marital master recommendations, to be $217,987 in FY 2014, $298,212 in FY 2015, $537,616 in FY 2016 and $596,424 in FY 2017.