SB 249 - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE
3Jan2018... 2393h
2017 SESSION
17-1001
08/
SENATE BILL 249
SPONSORS: Sen. Carson, Dist 14; Sen. Bradley, Dist 3
COMMITTEE: Judiciary
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This bill requires a determination of whether information in a police officer's personnel file constitutes exculpatory evidence and allows a police officer who has information determined to be exculpatory evidence in his or her personnel file to have an opportunity to challenge the disciplinary finding.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
3Jan2018... 2393h 17-1001
08/
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Seventeen
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 New Subdivision; Police Officers; Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence; Termination Prohibited. Amend RSA 105 by inserting after section 13-c the following new subdivision:
Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence
105:13-d Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence.
I. In this subdivision:
(a) "Exculpatory evidence" means any information required to be disclosed to the defendant in a criminal case under the federal constitution or the state constitution.
(b) "Personnel file" includes all employment records and any related internal affairs investigations.
II. The prosecutor shall have access to the complete personnel file of any police officer who may be a witness for either party in any criminal case for the purpose of determining the existence of potentially exculpatory evidence. If the prosecutor cannot determine whether such evidence is exculpatory, he or she shall petition the court for an in camera review of the evidence. No prosecutor who reviews a police officer's personnel file shall disclose any information obtained as a result of the review, except as required in this paragraph or to the extent necessary to comply with the federal constitution or state constitution. The personnel file shall remain confidential unless otherwise provided by law.
III. When the head of a law enforcement agency determines that a police officer's personnel file may contain potentially exculpatory evidence, he or she shall notify the police officer of that determination. The police officer shall have the opportunity to challenge the disciplinary finding or other administrative action resulting from the potentially exculpatory evidence through available contractual, administrative, and legal means. However, the pendency of such challenge shall not prevent the disclosure of the potentially exculpatory evidence in a criminal proceeding in which an officer is a potential witness.
IV. The duty to disclose exculpatory evidence that should have been disclosed prior to trial shall be an ongoing duty that extends beyond a finding of guilt.
105:13-e Termination Prohibited. No police officer shall have his or her employment terminated based solely on a determination that the officer has potentially exculpatory evidence in his or her personnel file which may need to be disclosed to a criminal defendant. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the employing authority from terminating a police officer's employment based on conduct that is the subject of the exculpatory evidence.
2 Repeal. RSA 105:13-b, relative to confidentiality of police personnel files, is repealed.
3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
| Date | Body | Type |
|---|---|---|
| March 21, 2017 | Senate | Hearing |
| March 29, 2017 | Senate | Floor Vote |
| March 29, 2017 | Senate | Floor Vote |
| March 30, 2017 | Senate | Floor Vote |
| April 18, 2017 | House | Hearing |
| April 25, 2017 | House | Exec Session |
| Oct. 17, 2017 | House | Exec Session |
| Jan. 3, 2018 | House | Floor Vote |
Jan. 18, 2018: Sen. Carson Moved Nonconcur with the House Amendment, MA, VV; 01/18/2018; SJ 2
Jan. 3, 2018: Ought to Pass with Amendment 2393h: MA VV 01/03/2018 HJ 1 P. 88
Jan. 3, 2018: Amendment # 2017-2393h: AA VV 01/03/2018 HJ 1 P. 87
Jan. 3, 2018: Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2017-2393h (NT) for 01/03/2018 (Vote 15-2; RC)
Oct. 17, 2017: Executive Session: 10/17/2017 10:00 AM LOB 208
Sept. 7, 2017: Retained Bill Subcommittee Work Session: 09/07/2017 10:00 AM LOB 208
Sept. 5, 2017: Retained Bill Subcommittee Work Session: 09/05/2017 10:00 AM LOB 208
June 6, 2017: Retained Bill Full Committee Work Session: 06/06/2017 10:00 AM LOB 208
: Retained in Committee
April 25, 2017: Executive Session: 04/25/2017 10:00 AM LOB 208
April 18, 2017: Public Hearing: 04/18/2017 01:00 PM LOB 208
March 23, 2017: Introduced 03/23/2017 and referred to Judiciary HJ 11 P. 28
March 30, 2017: Ought to Pass: MA, VV; OT3rdg; 03/30/2017; SJ 12
March 30, 2017: Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 03/30/2017;
March 29, 2017: Special Order SB 249 to the beginning of Thursday 03/30/2017 Calendar, Without Objection, MA; 03/29/2017;
March 29, 2017: Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 03/29/2017; SC 16
March 21, 2017: Hearing: 03/21/2017, Room 100, SH, 10:30 am; SC 15
March 9, 2017: Introduced 03/09/2017 and Referred to Judiciary; SJ 9