SB 493 - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE
19Apr2018... 1171h
2018 SESSION
18-3008
04/03
SENATE BILL 493
SPONSORS: Sen. Carson, Dist 14; Sen. Gannon, Dist 23; Sen. Soucy, Dist 18; Sen. French, Dist 7; Sen. Bradley, Dist 3; Rep. Hopper, Hills. 2; Rep. M. McCarthy, Hills. 29; Rep. Wall, Straf. 6; Rep. Hinch, Hills. 21
COMMITTEE: Judiciary
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AMENDED ANALYSIS
This bill requires a determination of whether information in a police officer's personnel file constitutes exculpatory evidence and allows a police officer who has information determined to be exculpatory evidence in his or her personnel file to have an opportunity to challenge the disciplinary finding.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
19Apr2018... 1171h 18-3008
04/03
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Eighteen
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 New Subdivision; Police Officers; Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence; Termination Prohibited. Amend RSA 105 by inserting after section 13-c the following new subdivision:
Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence
105:13-d Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence.
I. In this subdivision:
(a) "Exculpatory evidence" means any information required to be disclosed to the defendant in a criminal case under the federal constitution or the state constitution.
(b) "Personnel file" includes all employment records and any related internal affairs investigations.
II. The prosecutor shall have access to the complete personnel file of any police officer who may be a witness for either party in any criminal case for the purpose of determining the existence of potentially exculpatory evidence. If the prosecutor cannot determine whether such evidence is exculpatory, he or she shall petition the court for an in camera review of the evidence. No prosecutor who reviews a police officer's personnel file shall disclose any information obtained as a result of the review, except as required in this paragraph or to the extent necessary to comply with the federal constitution or state constitution. The personnel file shall remain confidential unless otherwise provided by law.
III. When the head of a law enforcement agency determines that a police officer's personnel file may contain potentially exculpatory evidence, he or she shall notify the police officer of that determination. The police officer shall have the opportunity to challenge the disciplinary finding or other administrative action resulting from the potentially exculpatory evidence through available contractual, administrative, and legal means. However, the pendency of such challenge shall not prevent the disclosure of the potentially exculpatory evidence in a criminal proceeding in which an officer is a potential witness.
IV. The duty to disclose exculpatory evidence that should have been disclosed prior to trial shall be an ongoing duty that extends beyond a finding of guilt.
105:13-e Termination Prohibited. No police officer shall have his or her employment terminated based solely on a determination that the officer has potentially exculpatory evidence in his or her personnel file which may need to be disclosed to a criminal defendant. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the employing authority from terminating a police officer's employment based on conduct that is the subject of the exculpatory evidence.
2 Repeal. RSA 105:13-b, relative to confidentiality of police personnel files, is repealed.
3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
| Date | Body | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Jan. 30, 2018 | Senate | Hearing |
| Feb. 22, 2018 | Senate | Floor Vote |
| March 20, 2018 | House | Hearing |
| April 11, 2018 | House | Exec Session |
| House | Floor Vote | |
| April 19, 2018 | House | Floor Vote |
May 2, 2018: Sen. Carson Moved Nonconcur with the House Amendment, MA, VV; 05/02/2018; SJ 15
April 19, 2018: Ought to Pass with Amendment 1171h: MA VV 04/19/2018 HJ 13 P. 7
April 19, 2018: Amendment # 2018-1171h: AA VV 04/19/2018 HJ 13 P. 7
: Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2018-1171h (NT) (Vote 16-1; CC)
April 19, 2018: Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2018-1171h (NT) for 04/19/2018 (Vote 16-1; CC) HC 15 P. 6
April 11, 2018: Executive Session: 04/11/2018 LOB 208
March 20, 2018: Public Hearing: 03/20/2018 11:30 AM LOB 208
March 7, 2018: Introduced 03/07/2018 and referred to Judiciary HJ 7 P. 52
Feb. 22, 2018: Ought to Pass: MA, VV; OT3rdg; 02/22/2018; SJ 5
Feb. 22, 2018: Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 02/22/2018; Vote 5-0; CC SC 8
Jan. 30, 2018: Hearing: 01/30/2018, Room 100, SH, 09:15 am; SC 5
Jan. 3, 2018: To Be Introduced 01/03/2018 and Referred to Judiciary; SJ 1