Revision: Nov. 18, 2021, 12:31 p.m.
HB 1216-FN - AS INTRODUCED
2022 SESSION
22-2202
11/08
HOUSE BILL 1216-FN
AN ACT repealing the housing appeals board.
SPONSORS: Rep. B. Boyd, Hills. 21; Rep. Maggiore, Rock. 22
COMMITTEE: Judiciary
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS
This bill repeals the housing appeals board.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
22-2202
11/08
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty Two
AN ACT repealing the housing appeals board.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 Repeal. RSA 679, relative to the housing appeals board, is repealed.
2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
22-2202
10/28/21
HB 1216-FN- FISCAL NOTE
AS INTRODUCED
AN ACT repealing the housing appeals board.
FISCAL IMPACT: [ X ] State [ ] County [ ] Local [ ] None
|
| |||
| Estimated Increase / (Decrease) | |||
STATE: | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 |
Appropriation | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Expenditures | $0 | Indeterminable | Indeterminable | Indeterminable |
Funding Source: | [ X ] General [ ] Education [ ] Highway [ ] Other | |||
|
|
|
|
|
METHODOLOGY:
This bill repeals the Housing Appeals Board. The Board is administratively attached to the Department of Administrative Services.
The Department of Administrative Services made the following assumptions concerning the fiscal impact of this bill:
The Judicial Branch indicates this bill would result in an indeterminable increase in annual expenditures to the superior court. The Branch assumes the bill would result in roughly 22 cases per year filed in the Superior Court instead of the Housing Appeals Board based on the current number of cases pending provided by the Board. In the past the Judicial Branch has used averaged caseload data based on time studies to estimate the fiscal impact of proposed legislation. The per case data on costs currently available to the Judicial Branch are based on studies of judicial and clerical weighted caseload times for processing average routine criminal cases that are more than fifteen years old so the data does not have current validity. A new case study is being conducted.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Department of Administrative Services and Judicial Branch