SB 61 - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE
03/09/2023 0656s
8Jun2023... 1979h
2023 SESSION
23-0927
08/10
SENATE BILL 61
AN ACT relative to surface water setbacks for landfills.
SPONSORS: Sen. Avard, Dist 12; Sen. Lang, Dist 2; Sen. Ward, Dist 8; Sen. Watters, Dist 4; Sen. Carson, Dist 14
COMMITTEE: Energy and Natural Resources
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AMENDED ANALYSIS
This bill requires the department of environmental services to adopt rules relative to surface water setbacks for landfills. The bill makes an appropriation to the department.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
03/09/2023 0656s
8Jun2023... 1979h 23-0927
08/10
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty Three
AN ACT relative to surface water setbacks for landfills.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 Statement of Purpose. The protection of perennial rivers, lakes, and coastal waters from contamination is in the public interest of the state of New Hampshire. The general court recognizes that the state’s current statutes and rules provide for redundant protection of groundwater and surface water from releases or spills of leachate generated by disposal of waste in the state’s landfills. As environmental protection technology advances, however, the general court intends that the department of environmental services reexamine its rules periodically to determine whether the protections already provided by the rules can be enhanced for newly sited facilities. The purpose of this act is to direct the department to reexamine its rules governing setbacks of newly sited landfills from surface water bodies to impose site-specific requirements sufficient to prevent groundwater contaminated by a spill or release of leachate from reaching such a water body before remedial action can be implemented, to provide the department with representative factors that it must consider in adopting new setback rules, and to require the department to take into account certain additional environmental protective measures proposed by an applicant for a landfill permit. The act also sets a timeframe for the department’s adoption of new setback rules and requires that any newly-sited landfill permitted after the effective date comply with the new rules if they are timely adopted as provided in this act.
2 Findings. The general court finds that:
I. The current rules of the department of environmental services require a “thorough hydrogeological investigation” of any proposed landfill site so that “[t]he potential release of contaminants to surface waters can be prevented, attenuated or otherwise remediated.” Env-Sw 804.03(c)(3). The rules also contain multiple provisions for the design, construction, and operation of landfills that require redundant protections against groundwater and surface water contamination. These provisions include a minimum 200-foot setback between the proposed landfill footprint and any perennial surface water body. Env-Sw 804.03(d).
II. The department of environmental services' rules have proven effective in preventing releases of contaminants from the state’s lined landfills to groundwater and surface water, and the department’s requirement of a network of release detection wells at landfill sites enables the department to be notified of even low levels of contaminants in groundwater so that contamination is detected and remediated before the contaminants can migrate to surface water or sensitive receptors like drinking water wells.
III. The 200-foot minimum setback between landfills and perennial surface water in the department’s rules falls within one of 3 broad categories of methods used by other states to determine setbacks. The 3 categories are distance-based setbacks, site-specific setbacks, and distance-based setbacks that can be reduced by the landfill owner through implementation of design features that provide additional redundancy to the landfill’s environmental protection systems.
IV. The general court finds that the most protective of these methods is the use of site-specific setbacks. This approach avoids the possible limitations of the current one-size-fits-all distance-based method, ensures that the setback is based on the conditions at the specific site, and concentrates protections on downgradient groundwater and surface water where it belongs.
V. The state should encourage permit applicants to propose design features providing further redundancy to the landfill’s environmental protection systems and such features should be taken into account in the department’s determination of a site-specific setback.
VI. This approach reflects the balance New Hampshire seeks to strike in its environmental regulation between ensuring that all reasonably practicable and economically sound measures are used to protect our environment while providing permit applicants with incentives to improve environmental protection beyond the rigorous baseline standards.
3 New Paragraph; Rulemaking; Perennial Surface Water Setback. Amend RSA 149-M:7 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph:
III-a. Criteria for determining the site-specific setback of a landfill footprint from perennial surface water bodies to prevent, attenuate, or otherwise remediate the potential release of contaminants to each such surface water body from the landfill footprint. Any rules adopted by the department under this paragraph shall, in addition to any other factors the department deems necessary for the rules to provide adequate protection of perennial surface water, take into account the following with respect to the subsurface conditions between the proposed landfill footprint and the surface water body:
(a) The soil stratigraphy and permeability;
(b) The volume, gradients, and travel time of groundwater supplying the surface water body, including the means by which to measure or model representative travel time;
(c) Bedrock lithology and structure, including the nature, degree and continuity of fracturing; and
(d) Hydraulic conductivity and such processes as advection, dispersion, and diffusion in groundwater.
4 New Paragraph; Site-Specific Setback to Perennial Surface Water. Amend RSA 149-M:9 by inserting after paragraph XIV the following new paragraph:
XV.(a) In formulating a site-specific setback to perennial surface water under rules adopted pursuant to RSA 149-M:7, III-a, the department shall take into account any measures proposed in the application for a permit that would provide greater or more redundant protection of perennial surface water than the department would otherwise require under its rules. Such measures may include, without limitation:
(1) Installation of a tertiary soil or geomembrane liner system below the secondary liner system, providing a third layer of protection between waste materials and groundwater.
(2) Installation of a second monitoring zone beneath the secondary liner system providing redundant verification of the effectiveness of the liner systems.
(3) Conversion of the primary and/or secondary liner systems from the minimum single-liner design to an enhanced composite liner design in accordance with the department’s landfill design rules.
(4) Improvements to the engineered low permeability subgrade such as increases in thickness and reductions in permeability of the soil zones beneath the liner systems.
(5) Increasing the thickness of the liner by at least 20 mil for geomembrane liners and at least one foot for soil liners.
(6) Increasing the vertical separation distance of the secondary liner from groundwater to greater than the minimum set by the department’s rules.
(7) Installation of groundwater monitoring well networks that are capable of being utilized as groundwater extraction points or that provide points for sampling, groundwater characterization, or groundwater extraction in excess of what the department requires under its rules.
(8) Implementation of enhanced environmental monitoring programs, including increasing the frequency of sampling and analytical testing, incorporation of real-time monitoring systems, and use of automated collection with telemetry.
(b) If a permit application includes any measure pursuant to RSA 149-M:9, XV(a) and the department relies on such measure in the department's formulation of the site-specific setback required by RSA 149-M:7, III-a, the department shall include such measure as a condition to the permit.
5 Department of Environmental Services; Solid Waste Landfill Setback Requirements Assessment and Recommendations.
I. The department of environmental services shall contract with one or more qualified consulting firms or individuals to perform an assessment of the current perennial surface water protection and setback requirements that are applicable to the permitting of newly sited solid waste landfills in order to meet the requirements of sections 3 and 4 of this act. Within 30 days of the effective date of this act, the department shall post on its website a draft request for proposals from such consulting firms and individuals to conduct the assessment. The department shall include in the request for proposals provisions designed to prevent a situation, circumstance, or financial interest which has the reasonable potential to cause a prospective contractor's interest to interfere with the contractor's duties under the request for proposals and require disclosure in the response to the request for proposal submission by the consulting form or individual. The department shall accept public comment on the draft request for proposals for 30 days after such posting. The department shall issue the final request for proposals by October 1, 2023, with a submission deadline for proposals no later than 45 days after such issuance. The scope of the proposals shall include the following:
(a) An assessment of the environmental, safety, and technical aspects of perennial surface water setback requirements and related protections in current state law and administrative rules that are applicable to the permitting of newly-sited solid waste landfills;
(b) Recommendations for using the criteria enumerated in section 3 of this act to establish site-specific setbacks;
(c) Recommendations for any other factors the consultant determines to be necessary to provide adequate protection of perennial surface water in section 3 of this act. For each such recommendation, the consultant shall identify each state that has adopted the recommended factor and describe how such state has applied the recommended factor, including a summary of the outcome of each permit application to which the state has applied the recommended factor;
(d) Recommendations on a methodology for consideration of the measures set forth in section 4 of this act, and any similar additional recommended measures to provide greater or more redundant protection of perennial surface water in formulating a site-specific setback that differs from what the department would otherwise require under its rules; and
(e) Disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest.
II. The selected contractor shall complete the assessment and submit a final report to the department within 150 days after contract approval. The department shall provide the senate energy and natural resources committee and the house environment and agriculture committee with electronic copies of the report and shall make the report available on its website and shall review and consider the report’s recommendations when drafting the rules required under section 3 of this act.
6 Department of Environmental Services; Target for Completion of Rulemaking; Applicability.
I. If the rules required by sections 3 and 4 of this act are adopted by the department of environmental services within 24 months of this act's effective date:
(a) Any newly-sited landfill in the state that receives a standard permit, as defined by the department’s rules, shall meet the newly adopted setback rules; and
(b) The department may not issue any such standard permit without imposing a site-specific setback on the landfill’s design and construction in accordance with the newly adopted setback rules. Any standard permit application pending before the department on, or filed with the department after, the effective date of this act shall be fully processed in accordance with RSA 149-M:9, VIII and a decision on the application timely provided to the applicant, provided, however, that any approval of such an application shall be held in abeyance until the department adopts rules in accordance with sections 3 and 4 of this act or 24 months elapses after the effective date of this act, whichever occurs first.
II. Upon the department's adoption of the rules in accordance with sections 3 and 4 of this act within 24 months of the effective date, the applicant whose approval has been held in abeyance under this section shall submit a modification of its application proposing and substantiating with all requisite information contemplated by the newly adopted setback rules a site-specific setback for the proposed facility, and the department shall within 120 days of submission of the modification approve, deny, or modify the proposed site-specific setback and if the department approves or modifies the proposed setback it shall approve the standard permit conditioned on implementation of that setback.
III. Notwithstanding paragraph IV, if the department does not adopt rules in accordance with sections 3 and 4 of this act within 24 months of the effective date of this act, the department shall apply its current rules applicable to surface water protection in determining the required setback to any application for such a standard permit that is being held in abeyance when such 24-month period expires and approve it if it complies with the current rules.
IV. If the department is unable to complete the adoption of rules as required under this section as a result of a natural disaster, civil emergency, epidemic or pandemic, or other extraordinary circumstance substantially interfering with the customary operation of the department or state government, the commissioner may file for a waiver to extend the deadline under RSA 541-A:40, IV. During such time, the abeyance of approval of applications as outlined in subparagraph I(b) of this section shall continue in effect for no more than 90 days.
7 Appropriation; Department of Environmental Services. The sum of $200,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023 is hereby appropriated to the department of environmental services to fund a contract for assessment of the requirements for solid waste landfill setbacks from perennial surface water as provided in this act. Such appropriation shall be nonlapsing. The governor is authorized to draw a warrant for said sum out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
I. Section 7 of this act shall take effect June 30, 2023.
II. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
23-0927
Amended 3/20/23
SB 61- FISCAL NOTE
AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE (AMENDMENT #2023-0656s)
AN ACT relative to surface water setbacks for landfills.
FISCAL IMPACT: [ X ] State [ ] County [ ] Local [ ] None
|
| |||
| Estimated Increase / (Decrease) | |||
STATE: | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 |
Appropriation | $150,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Expenditures | $0 | $150,000 | $0 | $0 |
Funding Source: | [ X ] General [ ] Education [ ] Highway [ ] Other | |||
|
|
|
|
|
METHODOLOGY:
This bill requires the Department of Environmental services to adopt rules relative to surface water setbacks for landfills. The bill makes a nonlapsing appropriation to the Department in the amount of $150,000 from the general fund effective June 30, 2023.
The Department of Environmental Services states this bill would require it to contract for an assessment of the perennial surface water protection and setback requirements applicable to solid waste landfills. The Department assumes existing staff would coordinate preparation of the contract documents, oversee the contract, and coordinate the public comment period. Additional staff time would be required; however, existing staff would be temporarily redirected from their regular work to address the requirements of this bill. The Department estimates the final report would be submitted during the first half of FY 2025.
The Department assumes the amendment would not generate additional revenues for the State and would not impact county and local expenditures or revenues.
It is assumed that any state expenditures would occur after FY 2023.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Department of Environmental Services
| Date | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Feb. 22, 2023 | 2023-0656s |
| May 25, 2023 | 2023-1979h |
| June 7, 2023 | 2023-2160h |
| June 7, 2023 | 2023-2167h |
| June 20, 2023 | 2023-2205CofC |
| Date | Body | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Jan. 24, 2023 | Senate | Hearing |
| March 9, 2023 | Senate | Floor Vote |
| April 25, 2023 | House | Hearing |
| April 25, 2023 | House | Hearing |
| May 9, 2023 | House | Exec Session |
| May 23, 2023 | House | Exec Session |
| May 23, 2023 | House | Floor Vote |
| June 20, 2023 | House | Floor Vote |
| June 29, 2023 | House | Floor Vote |
June 29, 2023: Conference Committee Report 2023-2205c: Failed, DV 134-238 06/29/2023 HJ 17 P. 5
June 20, 2023: Conference Committee Report # 2023-2205c Filed 06/20/2023; As Amended by the House + New Amendment
June 15, 2023: Committee of Conference Meeting: 06/20/2023, 9:00 a.m., Room 100, SH
June 15, 2023: Speaker Appoints: Reps. Aron, Bixby, M. Murray, A. Davis 06/15/2023 HJ 16 P. 10
June 15, 2023: House Accedes to Senate Request for CofC (Rep. Aron): MA VV 06/15/2023 HJ 16 P. 10
June 15, 2023: President Appoints: Senators Avard, Pearl, Watters; 06/15/2023; SJ 19
June 15, 2023: Sen. Avard Moved Nonconcur with the House Amendment; Requests C of C, MA, VV; 06/15/2023; SJ 19
June 8, 2023: Ought to Pass with Amendment 2023-1979h: MA DV 236-132 06/08/2023 HJ 15 P. 31
June 8, 2023: FLAM # 2023-2167h (Reps. Potenza, Simon, Kofalt, Wheeler, Burnham, St. Clair): AF RC 152-226 06/08/2023 HJ 15
June 8, 2023: Amendment # 2023-1979h: AA DV 312-61 06/08/2023 HJ 15 P. 25
May 25, 2023: Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate
May 25, 2023: Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2023-1979h 05/23/2023 (Vote 12-8; RC)
May 10, 2023: ==CONTINUED== Executive Session: 05/23/2023 10:00 am LOB 301-303
May 2, 2023: ==RECESSED== Executive Session: 05/09/2023 01:00 pm LOB 301-303
May 2, 2023: Full Committee Work Session: 05/09/2023 09:30 am LOB 301-303
April 11, 2023: Public Hearing: 04/25/2023 12:45 pm LOB 301-303
April 4, 2023: Public Hearing: 04/25/2023 12:30 pm LOB 301-303
March 21, 2023: Introduced (in recess of) 03/16/2023 and referred to Environment and Agriculture
March 9, 2023: Ought to Pass with Amendment 2023-0656s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 03/09/2023; SJ 9
March 9, 2023: Committee Amendment # 2023-0656s, AA, VV; 03/09/2023; SJ 9
March 9, 2023: Ought to Pass with Amendment 2023-0656s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 03/09/2023; SJ 9
Feb. 22, 2023: Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2023-0656s, 03/09/2023; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 12
Jan. 19, 2023: Hearing: 01/24/2023, Room 103, SH, 09:30 am; SC 7
Jan. 12, 2023: Introduced 01/05/2023 and Referred to Energy and Natural Resources; SJ 4