Text to be removed highlighted in red.
-Six
A RESOLUTION declaring that Sharia law and political Islam represent an existential threat to the state and country and that any deference to Sharia law by a government institution is prohibited.
Whereas, Sharia law, defined in its fullness as described by Muslim scholars and enacted in the Muslim world, is the system of Islamic rules and regulations derived from the Quran and Sunnah, including Hadith, as interpreted by Islamic scholars across the centuries, that governs not only civil and criminal justice in an Islamic state, but also the personal and moral conduct of such a state's Muslim citizens, and includes a moral imperative to extend the Islamic state across the entire world.
Whereas, countries that claim to be governed by the provisions of Sharia employ criminal punishments that can only be described as cruel and unusual: the amputation of hands for crimes such as theft; toleration of honor killings, such as a man killing his daughter for wearing revealing clothing; flogging for the "sin" of drinking alcohol; the Islamic doctrine of personal jihad and terror; and the legitimized sex slavery of non-Muslims.
Whereas, the language of "Islamophobia" was developed by the Muslim Brotherhood in conjunction with the Marxist left, also known as the Red-Green Alliance, as outlined in the explanatory memorandum on the general strategic goal for the group in North America, to affect dhimmitude and advance United States culture and jurisprudence towards Sharia law, and this concept has been repeatedly enshrined in laws and rules across the country.
Whereas, Minnesota, New York, and California are all locales with Sharia enforcement in place, including unofficial Islamic tribunals and arbitration panels--such as the Islamic Tribunal of Greater Minneapolis in Minnesota--that apply Sharia principles in voluntary family, divorce, and civil disputes, often without full oversight to ensure compliance with U.S. constitutional rights; informal community enforcement mechanisms, including self-appointed patrols in Muslim-majority neighborhoods in New York City that monitor public behavior for adherence to Islamic norms, such as dress codes or alcohol consumption under the guise of community safety; and instances where local officials provide tacit cover or reluctance to intervene, as seen in reduced police surveillance in New York due to litigation pressures from Islamist groups and in California through CVE programs that prioritize community relations over scrutiny of Sharia-compliant activities by groups like the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California.
Whereas, in Europe, as in America, Sharia normalization did not begin with Islamic-law courts, as the United Kingdom now has instituted, nor with Sharia patrols, but rather with the charge of "Islamophobia," coinciding with Marxist narratives on "racism," "sexism," and so on that utilize social pressure, often applied via the "Aufheben der Kultur" formula of the Frankfurt School, that chill speech and upset opposition, thereby allowing rape gangs to flourish as in Britain, and political Islam to march through institutions largely unopposed as they de-legitimize constitutional law and order; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives:
That Sharia law and political Islam represent an existential threat to the citizens, culture, and institutions of New Hampshire and the United States of America, and that no deference is due Sharia by any institution of these constitutional sovereigns or any political subdivision thereof.
That the house clerk transmit a copy of this resolution to the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the governor of New Hampshire, the New Hampshire supreme court, and the members of the New Hampshire congressional delegation.
Text to be added highlighted in green.
-Six
A RESOLUTION declaring that Sharia law and political Islam represent an existential threat to the state and country and that any deference to Sharia law by a government institution is prohibited.
Whereas, Sharia law, defined in its fullness as described by Muslim scholars and enacted in the Muslim world, is the system of Islamic rules and regulations derived from the Quran and Sunnah, including Hadith, as interpreted by Islamic scholars across the centuries, that governs not only civil and criminal justice in an Islamic state, but also the personal and moral conduct of such a state's Muslim citizens, and includes a moral imperative to extend the Islamic state across the entire world.
Whereas, countries that claim to be governed by the provisions of Sharia employ criminal punishments that can only be described as cruel and unusual: the amputation of hands for crimes such as theft; toleration of honor killings, such as a man killing his daughter for wearing revealing clothing; flogging for the "sin" of drinking alcohol; the Islamic doctrine of personal jihad and terror; and the legitimized sex slavery of non-Muslims.
Whereas, the language of "Islamophobia" was developed by the Muslim Brotherhood in conjunction with the Marxist left, also known as the Red-Green Alliance, as outlined in the explanatory memorandum on the general strategic goal for the group in North America, to affect dhimmitude and advance United States culture and jurisprudence towards Sharia law, and this concept has been repeatedly enshrined in laws and rules across the country.
Whereas, Minnesota, New York, and California are all locales with Sharia enforcement in place, including unofficial Islamic tribunals and arbitration panels--such as the Islamic Tribunal of Greater Minneapolis in Minnesota--that apply Sharia principles in voluntary family, divorce, and civil disputes, often without full oversight to ensure compliance with U.S. constitutional rights; informal community enforcement mechanisms, including self-appointed patrols in Muslim-majority neighborhoods in New York City that monitor public behavior for adherence to Islamic norms, such as dress codes or alcohol consumption under the guise of community safety; and instances where local officials provide tacit cover or reluctance to intervene, as seen in reduced police surveillance in New York due to litigation pressures from Islamist groups and in California through CVE programs that prioritize community relations over scrutiny of Sharia-compliant activities by groups like the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California.
Whereas, in Europe, as in America, Sharia normalization did not begin with Islamic-law courts, as the United Kingdom now has instituted, nor with Sharia patrols, but rather with the charge of "Islamophobia," coinciding with Marxist narratives on "racism," "sexism," and so on that utilize social pressure, often applied via the "Aufheben der Kultur" formula of the Frankfurt School, that chill speech and upset opposition, thereby allowing rape gangs to flourish as in Britain, and political Islam to march through institutions largely unopposed as they de-legitimize constitutional law and order; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives:
That Sharia law and political Islam represent an existential threat to the citizens, culture, and institutions of New Hampshire and the United States of America, and that no deference is due Sharia by any institution of these constitutional sovereigns or any political subdivision thereof.
That the house clerk transmit a copy of this resolution to the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the governor of New Hampshire, the New Hampshire supreme court, and the members of the New Hampshire congressional delegation.